Archive for January, 2011

Jan 31

I Think We Need To See Other Cities

I found this interesting article on media-match:

Leaving Los Angeles?

January 26th, 2011 by Lee Jarvis

California has long been the heart of the film industry. It saw huge growth throughout the early 1900s with huge investment in infrastructure and migration from the rest of the US. It’s perfect weather and vast landscapes were ideal for filming, and the glamorous lifestyle portrayed by movie stars helped the Los Angeles area blossom into a haven for anyone looking for a break.

With an incredible rise, there is often an inevitable fall. As society and technology changed, so did people’s social habits. Cinema wasn’t as popular once TVs, drive-thru fast-food and rock’n’roll came around. Whilst the LA population continued to sky rocket, the film industry was shook up. Paramount Pictures are now the last major film studio still headquartered in Hollywood, the other having moved around the city after the Golden Age had burned out. MGM went from selling 50 movies a year, to selling their Culver City studio lot. The decline is also re-iterated today, with recent financial struggles forcing production companies and film studios to scrutinize the economic impact of their works harsher than ever. Even still, MGM even had to file for bankruptcy just two months ago.

Many film projects have move across country, rather than having to pack up altogether; this is made possible and more common with technological advances. Equipment is better, faster, smaller, lighter. Projects can be worked on digitally, saving space and time for transport.

Last year I came across this interesting map of filming locations selected for visual similarities between each area and their worldwide counterparts. The map was used by Paramount Studios and is from around 1927.

film location california paramount studio map 1927

Nowadays, the reality is that you can fly a team out to the middle of anywhere, and your running costs may even be cheaper than the LA equivalent. This recent report in the LA Times shares that “even with the increased activity, feature production remained less than half what it was in 1996, underscoring the long-term challenges L.A. faces as it struggles to keep movies and TV shows from leaving Southern California”

Things may be looking up. Film LA Inc. recorded an increase in commercial and television shoots over the last 12 months, although still some way off of where things were 15 years ago. The growth in using video as marketing and promotional tools means that every business is looking for talent to help expand their branding.

Is this enough to reel it back in? Are the new markets evolving fast enough to keep the film population in LA? Have YOU left LA? Have you taken work out of town? Would you never leave? Is all this complete bumpf? Share your thoughts below…

1
comments

Jan 25

Tough Decisions

 

This past week I had to make one of the toughest decisions I’ve had to make in an extremly long time.

As most of you know life as a production assistant can be pretty tough.  You work long hours for not much pay, and you end up having to find a new job every couple of months if you are one of the lucky ones.  A lot of your friends and family tend to ask the same questions of “are you sure you don’t want to find a more stable job?” and your response  is that you are trying to.

Well this past week one of those stable jobs somewhat fell in my lap.  One night as I was scouring the internet for new production jobs and I came across an ad on craigslist (of all places..) for a production coordinator position for a video game.  On a whim I thought why not and sent the company over my resume completly thinking that they would laugh that someone who is not in the video game industry is trying to apply for a coordinator position.

To my utter surprise they called me the next day for an interview.  To prepare myself, I tried to brush up on my video game knowledge by watching my boyfriend finish playing God of War 3.  (Is it obvious yet that I don’t really play that many games besides Harvest Moon?  Side note..if you are a girl and have no clue what Harvest Moon is seriously look it up.  You will thank me ).

The next day was the interview, and I have to say it was probably one of the most intense interviews I have ever had in my life.  The owner of the company seemed very nice at the end of the 2 hour meeting and said that he would contact me in a couple of days.  I walked out of there thinking that I bombed the interview and that I would never be hearing from this man again.  To my surprise a week later I got a call for a second interview.

At this point I was extremely excited.  I started thinking about how amazing it would be to have a stable job, to actually have health benefits and a company matching 401k.  Then my mind started to freak out.  I thought about all the reasons why I moved out to California (to work in production) and how taking this position would take me on a completely different career path and essentially away from television production.

After the second interview I spoke to everyone I knew for advice.  Most of it was somewhat helpful however, everyone kept saying that they couldn’t tell me which path to choose and that I’d have to figure this all out on my own.  At this point I was so frustrated with worrying about it that I almost wanted to  have someone just tell me which job to take so that I wouldn’t have to worry about it any more.

Later on that night I received the offer letter from the video game company in my email.  I was so happy that I got the position, but I was also completely frightened.  I stayed up for hours contemplating my decision and it wasn’t until I spoke with my brilliant mother that I finally figured it all out.  My mom asked me the one question that made everything clear in my mind.  She asked, “Rachel, why has this been such a hard decision for you?” to which I responded “because I’m afraid of walking away from television production.”  After a moment of silence she said “well then there is your answer”.

The next morning I called the company and explained to them how terribly sorry I was but I would not be accepting their offer.  A huge weight felt like it had been lifted from my shoulders.  I now knew exactly what I wanted to do with my career.

I know that some of you are thinking that I am an idiot for turning down a full time position, however, I know in my heart where I need to be.  Will it be a struggle?  Yes it will, but that’s what makes life interesting right?   I am not saying that my decision is the best one, but it is the best one for me right now.  And who knows…in the future the next time a full time position comes my way I may take it, but for now my career path is exactly where it needs to be.

1
comments

Jan 18

UTA Job List as of 1/4/11

I have the new UTA job list.. if you would like a copy please email me at rachelmmarks@gmail.com

Happy job hunting!

1
comments

Jan 13

You Are Such A Hypocrite James Cameron

 

As some of you may know Peter Berg is currently working on a new film based on Hasbro’s iconic game of Battleship.  Since James Cameron likes to comment about everything Hollywood here is his take on this upcoming film:

“We have a story crisis. Now they want to make the Battleship game into a film. This is pure desperation. Everyone in Hollywood knows how important it is that a film is a brand before it hit theaters. If a brand has been around, Harry Potter for example, or Spider-Man, you are light years ahead. And there lies the problem. Because unfortunately these franchises are become more ridiculous. Battleship. This degrades the cinema.”

Hmm that’s funny Mr. Cameron.  I seem to remember a little movie you created called Avatar that was a COMPLETE rip off from stories like Dances With Wolves and Pocahontas.  Before you start criticizing Peter Birg for creating a unique story from a game maybe you should look at your own work and see how much of it is actually an original idea.

0
comments

Jan 12

Amazon’s Scam Of A Film Studio

 

Yup you read the title correctly.  Amazon, as in the online store, has created it’s own “film studio” for the internet.  Yes this baffles my mind as well..

Amazon says that this is “a new online business that invites filmmakers and screenwriters around the world submit full-length movies and scripts to make money, get discovered, and get their movie made.”  Amazon goes on to say that they are going to hold monthly and yearly awards showcasing the best of the best giving up to 2.7 million dollars split up amongst the finalists.  Now at first glance I thought, wow that sounds pretty cool maybe I should think about this.  Then I searched around their website and other websites and started to become more and more disgusted with Amazon’s idea.

After reading the confusing development agreement (which you sign when you submit your work to Amazon Studios) here is what I can understand:

1) Amazon does not pay for you to submit your work to them.  This means that they are getting all of these amazing ideas for free.

2) When you submit a script or a “test movie” (which is an absolutely idiotic idea by the way) you are giving Amazon an exclusive 18 month option for your project for no pay.  This means you cannot pitch or sell your script or “test movie” for 18 months because Amazon owns the right to it.  Also during this 18 month period Amazon gets to do whatever it wants with your script.  The can completely change it to their liking, create a mash up of multiple scripts, create their own movie off the script, create a book off your script or any other derivative.

3) If Amazon decides to option your script or “test movie” you can be given up to $200,000 for it, which sounds amazing right?  In this case its not so amazing.   In Amazon’s contest rules section they state that they reserve the right to split up this amount to multiple individuals that submitted their work.  This means that if someone provided feedback to your script or submitted a script similar to yours Amazon can divide the cash prize amount and you could end up getting nothing at all.

4) When it comes to “test films”  Amazon says that you can’t always tell what a movie is going to be like by just reading  your script.  So they suggest that you create a “test film” to showcase what your script is about.  This “test film”  according to Amazon should be “ an inexpensive, full-length movie that tells the whole story of the script in a compelling way, has very good acting and sound, but that doesn’t necessarily have polished production values.”  So you want me to make my entire film by myself with no budget?  Are you kidding me?    Oh and as an added bonus.. Amazon reserves the right to sell your test film to a studio and kick you out as the director or screenwriter.

Trust me, I know that breaking into Hollywood is hard but this is jut not the way to do it.  To me this sounds like a huge marketing/pr scam for Amazon to get their hands on some free ideas and do whatever they want with them.  If anyone knows someone that has submitted their material I would love to here about their experience.

2
comments

Jan 12

2010 Films

I found this great youtube video showcasing  pretty much all the films made in 2010.  Check it out!

2
comments

Jan 11

This just makes me love Pixar even more

 

Check out this article from Geek O System on how Pixar’s bosses Alvy Ray Smith and Ed Catmull saved their employees from getting fired:

How Pixar Bosses Saved Their Employees from Layoffs

by Robert Quigley | 10:07 am, January 11th, 2011
Today, Pixar may be a multibillion dollar company seemingly capable of doing no wrong in the box office, but in its early days as Lucasfilm’s computer animation division, its future was far from certain. Indeed, in the mid-’80s, some at Lucasfilm doubted the value of computer animation, and the division faced deep layoffs. Then, its two heads, Alvy Ray Smith and Ed Catmull, saved it in a positively Pixaresque way.

The Harvard Business Review recently spoke to 25+ year Pixar vet Craig Good, who recounted the remarkable story:

[Lucasfilm president Doug] Norby was pressing Catmull and Smith to do some fairly deep layoffs. The two couldn’t bring themselves to do it. Instead, Catmull tried to make a financial case for keeping his group intact, arguing that layoffs would only reduce the value of a unit that Lucasfilm could profitably sell … But Norby was unmoved. As Craig tells it: “He was pestering Ed and Alvy for a list of names from the Computer Division to lay off, and Ed and Alvy kept blowing him off. Finally came the order: You will be in my office tomorrow morning at 9:00 with a list of names.”

So what did these two bosses do? “They showed up in his office at 9:00 and plunked down a list,” Craig told me. “It had two names on it: Ed Catmull and Alvy Ray Smith.”

The gutsy move worked, and not a single employee of what would soon become Pixar was fired. Not long afterwards, Lucasfilm spun Pixar off as its own company under Catmull’s and Smith’s leadership, selling it to Steve Jobs for $5 million; two decades later, Disney would buy it for $7.4 billion.

http://www.geekosystem.com/how-pixar-bosses-saved-their-employees-from-layoffs/

Seriously guys..please hire me

3
comments

Jan 10

Update on production resume

 

Today in the office I got assigned to put submitted resumes into a binder for my line producer.  As I was going through the resumes I started to realize that there are some extremly terrible production resumes out there and I mean seriously terrbile.

If you are making a  production resume or a CV for you silly Brits,  please just keep it simple.  All you really need is four columns.  First for the date you worked on the project, second for your title, third for the show name and network and the last one for the production company and viola!  You have the perfect production resume.    You do not need to describe every single thing you did  in your past positions because usually the person hiring you will know exactly what a PA does.

Also another tip.. make sure your resume makes it clear what type of position you are applying for.  For example if you are applying for a production assistant position make sure you have production assistant positions on your resume, not your summer job working at McDonalds.  Keep in mind that this is the first thing a potential employer will see from you so make it look good..not like you just threw it together 10 minutes ago.

If you are interested in seeing what my resume looks like for your reference feel free to email me.  I am no resume expert..but I do keep getting hired so I must be doing something right.

1
comments

Jan 10

Nickelodeon Fellowship Interview with Karen Kirkland

 

I found this great interview online through Amanda The Aspiring Writers Blog about the Nickelodeon Fellowship.  For those of you that don’t know what this fellowship is please check out their website at http://www.nickwriting.com

“It’s amazing to me how few television writers actually know about this fellowship, especially because it’s a paid program!” says Karen Kirkland, Executive Director of the Nickelodeon Writing Fellowship. Karen’s looking to spread the word, so I sat down with her to chat about what she’s looking for, what sitcoms writers should spec, what happens during the fellowship, and what previous fellows have gone on to do.

Do you think writers decide not to enter the program because they think “Oh, it’s Nickelodeon, and I don’t want to write kids’ stuff”?

It’s unfortunate, but I think a lot of writers don’t enter the program because they believe there’s a big difference in writing for Nick as opposed to writing for more “adult” network shows. If you’re a fan of our programming, you’ll notice it’s pure entertainment for kids, but there’s also a wink every now and then for the adult or older sibling who’s watching along. Keep in mind the stories are written by adults, but the one thing we do not do is dumb anything down for kids.

In order to submit to the program, you do NOT have to submit a spec script for a Nickelodeon show, it doesn’t even need to be kid-friendly. We accept spec scripts based on any ½-hour comedy out there currently on-air and in production on primetime network or cable.

Great story-telling is great story-telling. The content might be a little bit different, but I don’t think it precludes one from then going on and pursuing a career outside of Nickelodeon – if that’s what they so chose.

Bottom line – it’s about the work. The writers who have come through the program and have been staffed on Nickelodeon shows are doing well and are very happy – as are the writers who have come through the program, been staffed on our shows and have since moved on to primetime network shows.

Nickelodeon has been able to put kids first in almost everything we do. Having stories that are kid-relatable, stories that are funny and stories that originate from character – that’s what it’s all about.

How is writing for a Nickelodeon show different than writing for more adult shows?

In my opinion, it’s not really all that different. I think from a story perspective, making sure you understand the tone of the show, having a solid grasp of the character’s voices, having a unique story to tell and injecting the script with a huge dose of funny – it’s all the same.

I would say, however, that writing for our animated shows has proven to be a challenge to some of the writers that come through the program. For any writer who writes short stories, they know it’s not easy to clearly and concisely convey an action-packed story in 11 minutes.

I want to work with a writer that can give me a fresh perspective on the show they’re writing for. However I still want the tone of the show to remain intact and I still want the character voices to be accurate, but I’d want to get a sense of the writer’s voice, in terms of his or her point-of-view on a specific topic. That’s not an easy thing to do whether you’re writing for Nickelodeon or primetime network.

Do the fellows generally stay at Nick or move onto other kinds of shows?

Our 2009-2010 Writing Fellows “graduated” in October of 2010 and two of them got staff writing jobs. One got staffed on Fanboy and Chum Chum and the other got staffed on The Penguins of Madagascar. The third fellow is writing freelance on a new show for Nick.

When it comes to writers who have graduated from the program, some of them get staffed here at Nick and some of them don’t. Some of them get staffed here first and stay for a few years, then move on to other staff writing gigs once production has ended on the show they were writing for.

As a result of being in the fellowship, the majority of the writers who have come through the program have received multiple produced credits on Nickelodeon shows. However, our main objective is not only to get them produced credits, but also to get them staff writing jobs.

In the last six years, we’ve been successful at staffing the majority of our writers on Nickelodeon shows. In addition to those that are still writing for Nick (Jonathan Butler, Gabe Garza, Jessica Gao, May Chan, Ron Holsey, Ivory Floyd, Kerri Grant, Stacie Craig), others who have come through the fellowship are currently writing on or have written on shows like Modern Family, The Cleveland Show, Mr. Sunshine, Sesame Street, Everybody Hates Chris, My Boys, Arrested Development, and Aliens in America to name a few.

But for the writers who don’t get staffed, I don’t abandon them either. For instance, there was one writer this last cycle that didn’t get staffed, so I put her on a six-week script schedule and she started writing a Community spec. She completed that spec and now she’s on a new six-week script schedule for Modern Family. My door remains open… Even for the finalists who make it to speed interviews but don’t get chosen as Fellows, they know they can always pick up the phone and call – or come in for a Script Review.

What are some rookie mistakes you see writers make?

But it’s my opinion that in order to succeed in this business as a writer – you’re going to have to develop a thick skin. I know it can be tough at times because there are some execs out there who are frustrated writers themselves and they want you to take their notes, and commit entirely to their thought process.

Within the confines of the Writing Fellowship – a writer needs to be able to come to the table with the understanding that this is going to be a collaborative process. We’re going to have a conversation about structure, tone and dialogue and we’re also going to talk about what my “take away” is as a reader, as an audience member. I’m diving into your story with an open mind. What am I feeling? Is this what you’re trying to convey? What are the character motivations here? What kind of story are you really trying to tell? I think those questions are important ones. Also, on the flip side of that, a writer shouldn’t just agree with everything I’m saying. You can’t. You have to be committed to and stand-up for your creative vision. And I think that’s the fine line. The writers may not be as savvy coming into the program, but once they leave, they know exactly what that fine line is and how to navigate it. They understand the difference between not fighting for everything, but picking and choosing their battles and fighting for enough.

What are you looking for in the applications?

I don’t look at applications or bios and resumes until the very, very, very end of the application/submission process – which is usually about an hour before I’m about to get on the phone and do a phone interview with a writer. And the reason is that I want the work to speak for itself. When the scripts come in, we will tear off the cover page so we don’t know if you’re from California, Utah or New Jersey. We don’t know if you’re male or female.

Our selection process is very rigorous! There are three ‘rounds’ of reading. During round-one, all of the scripts are read by professional readers who are experienced at doing coverage and who understand the sensibilities of the fellowship. They understand precisely the qualities that make for a good script. Scripts that make it through the first-round are then moved into the second-round. The second-round scripts are read in-house by the coordinators and managers within Network, in both development and current series (both live action and animation). The third-round of reading is done by the Directors, EICs and VPs within development and current series, again both live action and animation.

After the scripts have gone through the several rounds of reading, I then read the scripts that have come through the sifter. At that point I may or may not “pass” on a few more. The writers of the remaining scripts become the semi-finalists. Keep in mind that at this point, we still haven’t even looked at the application, the bio or the resume for the writer. We don’t know anything about the writer other than his or her writing ability. All semi-finalists have a phone interview with me and it’s usually during this time I’ll take a look at the bio, resume and application so I can start to get a feel for who they are, what their passions are, etc. I’m intrigued by people and I want to find out what motivates writers and what drives them to create. During the hour-long phone interview is when I ask for a second spec (hint, hint). If the writer doesn’t have a second spec – they’re immediately disqualified. It’s my belief that if you’re a writer – you’re constantly writing, and if you’re a television writer – you should have more than one television spec. Once I read your second spec, you’re then called in for an in-person interview. If all goes well during the in-person interview – you’re then a finalist and moved into speed interviews. Speed interviews are a super intense series of interviews (with show creators, head writers, line producers and network executives) that take place over the course of a few days. Eleven interviews over a course of 4 days to be exact…

Would you read half hour pilots, or just specs?

Just specs. For submission to the fellowship you must submit a ½-hour spec script based on ANY comedic television series currently on-air and in production on primetime network or cable. Any ½-hour spec. It does NOT need to be for a Nickelodeon show, nor does it need to be kid-friendly. Keep in mind that we don’t accept pilots, original material or feature-length scripts.

A writer’s best bet is to write a spec script for 30 Rock, Modern Family, The Office, Parks and Recreation, Community, Curb Your Enthusiasm, It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia, How I Met Your Mother – just to name a few.

The script will mainly be judged on story, humor, dialogue, character development, structure and originality.

Do you think being good in a room is just as important as your writing?

I think so – but being “good” in a room is only relevant to the writer’s room you’re in. Every room is different. We’re looking for strong writers with great personalities. A writer that has a creative point-of-view, a writer we’d want to spend an entire year with, a writer that we’d feel comfortable sending into one of our writer’s rooms, someone who can hold his or her own. A writer that is able to pitch out jokes and break story. You have to know when not to be annoying. And for most writers who have never been in a room, it’s a little bit intimidating. But each of our productions have great creative teams that will help you along the way.

Did some of your previous applicants of fellows lack room experience but impress you anyway?


Yes. The majority of writers who become writing fellows don’t have any “professional” experience to speak of. In addition, to be considered for the program, you can’t have had any network or cable produced television credits. The program is here in part to help writers gain room experience.

So people shouldn’t be worried that they might not be ready for this?

No! I want writers to exercise their creative visions and realize their dreams. You are ready – right now!

Does diversity play a big part in choosing your fellows?
Yes it does! Writers sometimes think they shouldn’t apply because they’re not “diverse” – but “diversity” is inclusive of everyone. What does that mean? It means that we’re giving everybody a fair share and equal opportunity. That’s really important.

What is it that really impresses you in the scripts that are submitted? Is it a fresh unique point of view, a writing style, etc?

It’s a combination of all of that. I love it when I can read a 30 Rock spec where the writer has not only given me a fresh perspective on the show in terms of the story idea and the premise, but that I can still feel the tone of the show, the character voices have remained intact, but the writer’s voice – in terms of his or her perspective, is also coming through in that script. That’s a really difficult thing to do. And of course, your script has to make me laugh out loud! It has to be funny. The dialogue needs to be witty. Your story, the arcs and your characters all need to be multi-layered. I can always tell when a writer’s had fun writing their script because I have fun reading it.

So do you think it’s a bad idea for writers to spec shows they don’t love?

I think yes and no. For entrance into competitions such as this one – to showcase your best work – yes, I think it’s best that you stick with a show that you absolutely love. Pick a show that you find humorous and a show that you can relate to. But on the other hand, once you get into the program, it’s not always going to be that easy. We’ve had writers in the past who were assigned to write specs for shows that they were not necessarily big fans of. But what if you get hired on a show you don’t like? The showrunner doesn’t care whether or not you like the show – they care whether or not you can deliver a good script. For programs like this, yes, write something that you love, but be prepared that you may not always be able to do that.

So what happens when the fellows are actually in the program?

The Fellows begin in October every year, and they come into the office every day from 10am to 5pm.

We feel that one of the most beneficial tools a television writer can have is the working knowledge of the creative process of getting notes from an executive and learning how to incorporate those notes into their scripts. To that end, we assign the Fellow to an Executive in Charge of a show (an EIC). The Fellow will spend a week researching that show and coming up with 3 story ideas. The Fellow will then pitch his/her story ideas to the exec. The exec will choose one of them, give the writer some notes and then the writer will have two days to write a premise based on that story idea. Once the premise is complete – we’ll then put the Fellow on a six week writing schedule. During this time, they’ll have two weeks to write an outline, and turn it into the EIC. We schedule yet another notes meeting and the writer will either need to revise the outline, or move on and write the first draft. They’ll have a week to write the first draft, followed by a notes meeting, then two days to write a second draft, then a notes meeting… They’ll continue on this path all the way through to the final draft. Each fellow does this for both a live-action show and an animated show.

In addition, during the first few months the writers are inundated with meetings with everyone at the Studio, from executives, to show creators, to head writers, to line producers and even folks in our post-production department. These are elongated one-hour meetings, and the writer must come to the meeting prepared with at least 10 questions for the person they’re meeting with. The fellow is then free to network and nurture relationships, which is something we encourage.

Interspersed with their writing and their meetings are in-house workshops on how to break story to how to write for comedy to how to succeed in Hollywood – and that’s over the course of 4 or 5 months. Then we send them to UCB, where they take improv classes. Then we send them off to the Robert McKee “Story” weekend.

By March or April, they are ultimately placed on a show – where they get experience in the writer’s room – which is so incredibly valuable. Within the first few weeks of being on the show, the fellow is usually pitching out story ideas and/or they’ve been assigned another script to write (this one getting produced). Ultimately, the fellow stays on that show until their fellowship is over in October, and hopefully – like many of our past writers, will then segue onto the show as a staff writer.

Has the program changed at all over the past few years?

I think the program has grown by leaps and bounds! There are now distinct systems in place that help to ensure we’re staffing as many writers as possible within a given year. When I first began at Nickelodeon six years ago, the program was not very well-known within the industry at-large. I was amazed by how few writers, executives and agents knew about the program. Especially because it was such an amazing opportunity for writers to get paid while doing what they love to do – write! Unlike before, now many of the writers that graduate from the program are either being staffed on our shows, or they are leaving well-equipped to get staff writing jobs elsewhere within the industry.

The way in which we recruit writers has changed as well. We now take a very active approach in discovering new writing talent. We spend hours & days at film festivals exposing writers to our How to Tell a Story workshop and giving Script Reviews. I travel a lot throughout the year to various colleges around the Country spreading the word about the program and encouraging graduating students to apply.

Just this year we finally have a presence on Facebook and on Twitter. We’re attempting to take advantage of as many social media outlets as possible. We’ll most likely be starting a blog soon.

I would say that now after many years of marketing the program and after many staffing success stories – we’ve begun to nurture relationships within the industry as a whole and folks are starting to take notice.

What feedback have you gotten from the showrunners and show creators about the program?

I think I’m really lucky (and so are the Writing Fellows) because I oversee (and they are a part of) a program that the Network and the other Producers here at the Studio absolutely love. A huge amount of value is placed on the program and the Network is completely committed to helping us place the most talented writers into the program and ultimately onto our shows. I think of this program as a talent pool, and when an exec or a production is in need of a writer, they know exactly where to go!

I think part of what makes this program so successful and why we’re able to staff so many writers on our shows is that we’ve gotten complete buy-in down the line – from our exec team to our show creators, to our line producers and from the other writers on each of our shows.

Anything else people should know if they’re thinking of applying?

Have multiple 1/2-hour television specs written – assuming you want to write for television.

Beware of typos – they are not your friend!

Do your research – it’s not enough to watch a couple of episodes. Watch them all – multiple times!

Before you write your spec, do yourself a favor – write a 1/2-page premise first, then an outline, then (and only then) should you write your first draft.

Have a unique premise, a well told story, a clear A, B and C story, clearly defined character motivations, scenes that move the story forward, and a solid structure.

The Nickelodeon Writing Fellowship is definitely a fun program to be in, but it’s also a very tough program – a boot camp of sorts. The program is geared toward writers who are seriously committed to their craft, to becoming better writers, to learning more about the business and to being open to the process. The writers that are in this program work really hard to be successful.

The deadline to apply for this year’s program is February 28. For more information, check out the Nickelodeon Writing Fellowship official website, follow them on Twitter and find them on Facebook.

Also for great writing tips check out http://aspiringtvwriter.blogspot.com

3
comments

Jan 10

To be an assistant or to stay freelance

 

For the past year I have been working freelance as a production assistant and I have to admit there are some days when I wish I could finally land a full time job.  It admittedly gets very old having to look for a new job every couple of months.  That being said I think my career path would take a different turn in the industry if I decided to stop working freelance, and here are my options:

I could try to find a position as a producer or director’s assistant.  The pro’s of this position would be that I would be working directly or close to directly underneath an producer in Hollywood and I would be somewhat involved with the films or tv shows that he/she is working on.  I would be doing a lot of script coverage which means I would be reading scripts and taking notes on them to help the producer decide if the script is worth them reading.  The con’s would be that I would be doing a lot of regular assistant duties like scheduling, answering phones, and picking up coffee.

I could also work at a network or a studio as someone’s assistant.  There are a lot of different divisions at a studio and a network from legal and financing to development and business affairs.  Depending on who I am assisting my job could differ however  most likely I would end up doing a lot of regular assistant duties with a few interesting projects thrown in.

Last but not least I could become a personal assistant to a director, writer or even a celebrity.  In this position my main job would be dealing with scheduling, and basically organizing that persons life, which could usually end up meaning I would have no personal life of my own.

As you can see most of these positions are not the most glamorous positions, but then again neither is being a PA.  Either way I will have to work my way up from the bottom.

I have never really been an assistant so I’d love to hear someone’s experience being one.  Email your story or post it in the comments.

0
comments